Monday, August 08, 2011

A REPORTER AT LARGE GETTING BIN LADEN
What happened that night in Abbottabad.
by Nicholas Schmidle THE NEW YORKER

No American was yet inside the residential part of the compound. The operatives had barely been on target for a minute, and the mission was already veering off course. Photoillustration by John Ritter.

Shortly after eleven o’clock on the night of May 1st, two MH-60 Black Hawk helicopters lifted off from Jalalabad Air Field, in eastern Afghanistan, and embarked on a covert mission into Pakistan to kill Osama bin Laden. Inside the aircraft were twenty-three Navy SEALs from Team Six, which is officially known as the Naval Special Warfare Development Group, or DEVGRU. A Pakistani-American translator, whom I will call Ahmed, and a dog named Cairo—a Belgian Malinois—were also aboard. It was a moonless evening, and the helicopters’ pilots, wearing night-vision goggles, flew without lights over mountains that straddle the border with Pakistan. Radio communications were kept to a minimum, and an eerie calm settled inside the aircraft.
Fifteen minutes later, the helicopters ducked into an alpine valley and slipped, undetected, into Pakistani airspace. For more than sixty years, Pakistan’s military has maintained a state of high alert against its eastern neighbor, India. Because of this obsession, Pakistan’s “principal air defenses are all pointing east,” Shuja Nawaz, an expert on the Pakistani Army and the author of “Crossed Swords: Pakistan, Its Army, and the Wars Within,” told me. Senior defense and Administration officials concur with this assessment, but a Pakistani senior military official, whom I reached at his office, in Rawalpindi, disagreed. “No one leaves their borders unattended,” he said. Though he declined to elaborate on the location or orientation of Pakistan’s radars—“It’s not where the radars are or aren’t”—he said that the American infiltration was the result of “technological gaps we have vis-à-vis the U.S.” The Black Hawks, each of which had two pilots and a crewman from the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, or the Night Stalkers, had been modified to mask heat, noise, and movement; the copters’ exteriors had sharp, flat angles and were covered with radar-dampening “skin.”
The SEALs’ destination was a house in the small city of Abbottabad, which is about a hundred and twenty miles across the Pakistan border. Situated north of Islamabad, Pakistan’s capital, Abbottabad is in the foothills of the Pir Panjal Range, and is popular in the summertime with families seeking relief from the blistering heat farther south. Founded in 1853 by a British major named James Abbott, the city became the home of a prestigious military academy after the creation of Pakistan, in 1947. According to information gathered by the Central Intelligence Agency, bin Laden was holed up on the third floor of a house in a one-acre compound just off Kakul Road in Bilal Town, a middle-class neighborhood less than a mile from the entrance to the academy. If all went according to plan, the SEALs would drop from the helicopters into the compound, overpower bin Laden’s guards, shoot and kill him at close range, and then take the corpse back to Afghanistan.
The helicopters traversed Mohmand, one of Pakistan’s seven tribal areas, skirted the north of Peshawar, and continued due east. The commander of DEVGRU’s Red Squadron, whom I will call James, sat on the floor, squeezed among ten other SEALs, Ahmed, and Cairo. (The names of all the covert operators mentioned in this story have been changed.) James, a broad-chested man in his late thirties, does not have the lithe swimmer’s frame that one might expect of a SEAL—he is built more like a discus thrower. That night, he wore a shirt and trousers in Desert Digital Camouflage, and carried a silenced Sig Sauer P226 pistol, along with extra ammunition; a CamelBak, for hydration; and gel shots, for endurance. He held a short-barrel, silenced M4 rifle. (Others SEALs had chosen the Heckler & Koch MP7.) A “blowout kit,” for treating field trauma, was tucked into the small of James’s back. Stuffed into one of his pockets was a laminated gridded map of the compound. In another pocket was a booklet with photographs and physical descriptions of the people suspected of being inside. He wore a noise-cancelling headset, which blocked out nearly everything besides his heartbeat.
During the ninety-minute helicopter flight, James and his teammates rehearsed the operation in their heads. Since the autumn of 2001, they had rotated through Afghanistan, Iraq, Yemen, and the Horn of Africa, at a brutal pace. At least three of the SEALs had participated in the sniper operation off the coast of Somalia, in April, 2009, that freed Richard Phillips, the captain of the Maersk Alabama, and left three pirates dead. In October, 2010, a DEVGRU team attempted to rescue Linda Norgrove, a Scottish aid worker who had been kidnapped in eastern Afghanistan by the Taliban. During a raid of a Taliban hideout, a SEAL tossed a grenade at an insurgent, not realizing that Norgrove was nearby. She died from the blast. The mistake haunted the SEALs who had been involved; three of them were subsequently expelled from DEVGRU.
The Abbottabad raid was not DEVGRU’s maiden venture into Pakistan, either. The team had surreptitiously entered the country on ten to twelve previous occasions, according to a special-operations officer who is deeply familiar with the bin Laden raid. Most of those missions were forays into North and South Waziristan, where many military and intelligence analysts had thought that bin Laden and other Al Qaeda leaders were hiding. (Only one such operation—the September, 2008, raid of Angoor Ada, a village in South Waziristan—has been widely reported.) Abbottabad was, by far, the farthest that DEVGRU had ventured into Pakistani territory. It also represented the team’s first serious attempt since late 2001 at killing “Crankshaft”—the target name that the Joint Special Operations Command, or JSOC, had given bin Laden. Since escaping that winter during a battle in the Tora Bora region of eastern Afghanistan, bin Laden had defied American efforts to trace him. Indeed, it remains unclear how he ended up living in Abbottabad.
Forty-five minutes after the Black Hawks departed, four MH-47 Chinooks launched from the same runway in Jalalabad. Two of them flew to the border, staying on the Afghan side; the other two proceeded into Pakistan. Deploying four Chinooks was a last-minute decision made after President Barack Obama said he wanted to feel assured that the Americans could “fight their way out of Pakistan.” Twenty-five additional SEALs from DEVGRU, pulled from a squadron stationed in Afghanistan, sat in the Chinooks that remained at the border; this “quick-reaction force” would be called into action only if the mission went seriously wrong. The third and fourth Chinooks were each outfitted with a pair of M134 Miniguns. They followed the Black Hawks’ initial flight path but landed at a predetermined point on a dry riverbed in a wide, unpopulated valley in northwest Pakistan. The nearest house was half a mile away. On the ground, the copters’ rotors were kept whirring while operatives monitored the surrounding hills for encroaching Pakistani helicopters or fighter jets. One of the Chinooks was carrying fuel bladders, in case the other aircraft needed to refill their tanks.
Meanwhile, the two Black Hawks were quickly approaching Abbottabad from the northwest, hiding behind the mountains on the northernmost edge of the city. Then the pilots banked right and went south along a ridge that marks Abbottabad’s eastern perimeter. When those hills tapered off, the pilots curled right again, toward the city center, and made their final approach.
During the next four minutes, the interior of the Black Hawks rustled alive with the metallic cough of rounds being chambered. Mark, a master chief petty officer and the ranking noncommissioned officer on the operation, crouched on one knee beside the open door of the lead helicopter. He and the eleven other SEALs on “helo one,” who were wearing gloves and had on night-vision goggles, were preparing to fast-rope into bin Laden’s yard. They waited for the crew chief to give the signal to throw the rope. But, as the pilot passed over the compound, pulled into a high hover, and began lowering the aircraft, he felt the Black Hawk getting away from him. He sensed that they were going to crash.
ne month before the 2008 Presidential election, Obama, then a senator from Illinois, squared off in a debate against John McCain in an arena at Belmont University, in Nashville. A woman in the audience asked Obama if he would be willing to pursue Al Qaeda leaders inside Pakistan, even if that meant invading an ally nation. He replied, “If we have Osama bin Laden in our sights and the Pakistani government is unable, or unwilling, to take them out, then I think that we have to act and we will take them out. We will kill bin Laden. We will crush Al Qaeda. That has to be our biggest national-security priority.” McCain, who often criticized Obama for his naïveté on foreign-policy matters, characterized the promise as foolish, saying, “I’m not going to telegraph my punches.”
Four months after Obama entered the White House, Leon Panetta, the director of the C.I.A., briefed the President on the agency’s latest programs and initiatives for tracking bin Laden. Obama was unimpressed. In June, 2009, he drafted a memo instructing Panetta to create a “detailed operation plan” for finding the Al Qaeda leader and to “ensure that we have expended every effort.” Most notably, the President intensified the C.I.A.’s classified drone program; there were more missile strikes inside Pakistan during Obama’s first year in office than in George W. Bush’s eight. The terrorists swiftly registered the impact: that July, CBS reported that a recent Al Qaeda communiqué had referred to “brave commanders” who had been “snatched away” and to “so many hidden homes [which] have been levelled.” The document blamed the “very grave” situation on spies who had “spread throughout the land like locusts.” Nevertheless, bin Laden’s trail remained cold.
In August, 2010, Panetta returned to the White House with better news. C.I.A. analysts believed that they had pinpointed bin Laden’s courier, a man in his early thirties named Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti. Kuwaiti drove a white S.U.V. whose spare-tire cover was emblazoned with an image of a white rhino. The C.I.A. began tracking the vehicle. One day, a satellite captured images of the S.U.V. pulling into a large concrete compound in Abbottabad. Agents, determining that Kuwaiti was living there, used aerial surveillance to keep watch on the compound, which consisted of a three-story main house, a guesthouse, and a few outbuildings. They observed that residents of the compound burned their trash, instead of putting it out for collection, and concluded that the compound lacked a phone or an Internet connection. Kuwaiti and his brother came and went, but another man, living on the third floor, never left. When this third individual did venture outside, he stayed behind the compound’s walls. Some analysts speculated that the third man was bin Laden, and the agency dubbed him the Pacer.
Obama, though excited, was not yet prepared to order military action. John Brennan, Obama’s counterterrorism adviser, told me that the President’s advisers began an “interrogation of the data, to see if, by that interrogation, you’re going to disprove the theory that bin Laden was there.” The C.I.A. intensified its intelligence-collection efforts, and, according to a recent report in the Guardian, a physician working for the agency conducted an immunization drive in Abbottabad, in the hope of acquiring DNA samples from bin Laden’s children. (No one in the compound ultimately received any immunizations.)
In late 2010, Obama ordered Panetta to begin exploring options for a military strike on the compound. Panetta contacted Vice-Admiral Bill McRaven, the SEAL in charge of JSOC. Traditionally, the Army has dominated the special-operations community, but in recent years the SEALs have become a more prominent presence; McRaven’s boss at the time of the raid, Eric Olson—the head of Special Operations Command, or SOCOM—is a Navy admiral who used to be a commander of DEVGRU. In January, 2011, McRaven asked a JSOC official named Brian, who had previously been a DEVGRU deputy commander, to present a raid plan. The next month, Brian, who has the all-American look of a high-school quarterback, moved into an unmarked office on the first floor of the C.I.A.’s printing plant, in Langley, Virginia. Brian covered the walls of the office with topographical maps and satellite images of the Abbottabad compound. He and half a dozen JSOC officers were formally attached to the Pakistan/Afghanistan department of the C.I.A.’s Counterterrorism Center, but in practice they operated on their own. A senior counterterrorism official who visited the JSOC redoubt described it as an enclave of unusual secrecy and discretion. “Everything they were working on was closely held,” the official said.
The relationship between special-operations units and the C.I.A. dates back to the Vietnam War. But the line between the two communities has increasingly blurred as C.I.A. officers and military personnel have encountered one another on multiple tours of Iraq and Afghanistan. “These people grew up together,” a senior Defense Department official told me. “We are in each other’s systems, we speak each other’s languages.” (Exemplifying this trend, General David H. Petraeus, the former commanding general in Iraq and Afghanistan, is now the incoming head of the C.I.A., and Panetta has taken over the Department of Defense.) The bin Laden mission—plotted at C.I.A. headquarters and authorized under C.I.A. legal statutes but conducted by Navy DEVGRU operators—brought the coöperation between the agency and the Pentagon to an even higher level. John Radsan, a former assistant general counsel at the C.I.A., said that the Abbottabad raid amounted to “a complete incorporation of JSOC into a C.I.A. operation.”
n March 14th, Obama called his national-security advisers into the White House Situation Room and reviewed a spreadsheet listing possible courses of action against the Abbottabad compound. Most were variations of either a JSOC raid or an airstrike. Some versions included coöperating with the Pakistani military; some did not. Obama decided against informing or working with Pakistan. “There was a real lack of confidence that the Pakistanis could keep this secret for more than a nanosecond,” a senior adviser to the President told me. At the end of the meeting, Obama instructed McRaven to proceed with planning the raid.
Brian invited James, the commander of DEVGRU’s Red Squadron, and Mark, the master chief petty officer, to join him at C.I.A. headquarters. They spent the next two and a half weeks considering ways to get inside bin Laden’s house. One option entailed flying helicopters to a spot outside Abbottabad and letting the team sneak into the city on foot. The risk of detection was high, however, and the SEALs would be tired by a long run to the compound. The planners had contemplated tunnelling in—or, at least, the possibility that bin Laden might tunnel out. But images provided by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency showed that there was standing water in the vicinity, suggesting that the compound sat in a flood basin. The water table was probably just below the surface, making tunnels highly unlikely. Eventually, the planners agreed that it made the most sense to fly directly into the compound. “Special operations is about doing what’s not expected, and probably the least expected thing here was that a helicopter would come in, drop guys on the roof, and land in the yard,” the special-operations officer said.
On March 29th, McRaven brought the plan to Obama. The President’s military advisers were divided. Some supported a raid, some an airstrike, and others wanted to hold off until the intelligence improved. Robert Gates, the Secretary of Defense, was one of the most outspoken opponents of a helicopter assault. Gates reminded his colleagues that he had been in the Situation Room of the Carter White House when military officials presented Eagle Claw—the 1980 Delta Force operation that aimed at rescuing American hostages in Tehran but resulted in a disastrous collision in the Iranian desert, killing eight American soldiers. “They said that was a pretty good idea, too,” Gates warned. He and General James Cartwright, the vice-chairman of the Joint Chiefs, favored an airstrike by B-2 Spirit bombers. That option would avoid the risk of having American boots on the ground in Pakistan. But the Air Force then calculated that a payload of thirty-two smart bombs, each weighing two thousand pounds, would be required to penetrate thirty feet below ground, insuring that any bunkers would collapse. “That much ordnance going off would be the equivalent of an earthquake,” Cartwright told me. The prospect of flattening a Pakistani city made Obama pause. He shelved the B-2 option and directed McRaven to start rehearsing the raid.
Brian, James, and Mark selected a team of two dozen SEALs from Red Squadron and told them to report to a densely forested site in North Carolina for a training exercise on April 10th. (Red Squadron is one of four squadrons in DEVGRU, which has about three hundred operators in all.) None of the SEALs, besides James and Mark, were aware of the C.I.A. intelligence on bin Laden’s compound until a lieutenant commander walked into an office at the site. He found a two-star Army general from JSOC headquarters seated at a conference table with Brian, James, Mark, and several analysts from the C.I.A. This obviously wasn’t a training exercise. The lieutenant commander was promptly “read in.” A replica of the compound had been built at the site, with walls and chain-link fencing marking the layout of the compound. The team spent the next five days practicing maneuvers.
On April 18th, the DEVGRU squad flew to Nevada for another week of rehearsals. The practice site was a large government-owned stretch of desert with an elevation equivalent to the area surrounding Abbottabad. An extant building served as bin Laden’s house. Aircrews plotted out a path that paralleled the flight from Jalalabad to Abbottabad. Each night after sundown, drills commenced. Twelve SEALs, including Mark, boarded helo one. Eleven SEALs, Ahmed, and Cairo boarded helo two. The pilots flew in the dark, arrived at the simulated compound, and settled into a hover while the SEALs fast-roped down. Not everyone on the team was accustomed to helicopter assaults. Ahmed had been pulled from a desk job for the mission and had never descended a fast rope. He quickly learned the technique.
The assault plan was now honed. Helo one was to hover over the yard, drop two fast ropes, and let all twelve SEALs slide down into the yard. Helo two would fly to the northeast corner of the compound and let out Ahmed, Cairo, and four SEALs, who would monitor the perimeter of the building. The copter would then hover over the house, and James and the remaining six SEALs would shimmy down to the roof. As long as everything was cordial, Ahmed would hold curious neighbors at bay. The SEALs and the dog could assist more aggressively, if needed. Then, if bin Laden was proving difficult to find, Cairo could be sent into the house to search for false walls or hidden doors. “This wasn’t a hard op,” the special-operations officer told me. “It would be like hitting a target in McLean”—the upscale Virginia suburb of Washington, D.C.
A planeload of guests arrived on the night of April 21st. Admiral Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, along with Olson and McRaven, sat with C.I.A. personnel in a hangar as Brian, James, Mark, and the pilots presented a brief on the raid, which had been named Operation Neptune’s Spear. Despite JSOC’s lead role in Neptune’s Spear, the mission officially remained a C.I.A. covert operation. The covert approach allowed the White House to hide its involvement, if necessary. As the counterterrorism official put it recently, “If you land and everybody is out on a milk run, then you get the hell out and no one knows.” After describing the operation, the briefers fielded questions: What if a mob surrounded the compound? Were the SEALs prepared to shoot civilians? Olson, who received the Silver Star for valor during the 1993 “Black Hawk Down” episode, in Mogadishu, Somalia, worried that it could be politically catastrophic if a U.S. helicopter were shot down inside Pakistani territory. After an hour or so of questioning, the senior officers and intelligence analysts returned to Washington. Two days later, the SEALs flew back to Dam Neck, their base in Virginia.
On the night of Tuesday, April 26th, the SEAL team boarded a Boeing C-17 Globemaster at Naval Air Station Oceana, a few miles from Dam Neck. After a refuelling stop at Ramstein Air Base, in Germany, the C-17 continued to Bagram Airfield, north of Kabul. The SEALs spent a night in Bagram and moved to Jalalabad on Wednesday.
That day in Washington, Panetta convened more than a dozen senior C.I.A. officials and analysts for a final preparatory meeting. Panetta asked the participants, one by one, to declare how confident they were that bin Laden was inside the Abbottabad compound. The counterterrorism official told me that the percentages “ranged from forty per cent to ninety or ninety-five per cent,” and added, “This was a circumstantial case.”
Panetta was mindful of the analysts’ doubts, but he believed that the intelligence was better than anything that the C.I.A. had gathered on bin Laden since his flight from Tora Bora. Late on Thursday afternoon, Panetta and the rest of the national-security team met with the President. For the next few nights, there would be virtually no moonlight over Abbottabad—the ideal condition for a raid. After that, it would be another month until the lunar cycle was in its darkest phase. Several analysts from the National Counterterrorism Center were invited to critique the C.I.A.’s analysis; their confidence in the intelligence ranged between forty and sixty per cent. The center’s director, Michael Leiter, said that it would be preferable to wait for stronger confirmation of bin Laden’s presence in Abbottabad. Yet, as Ben Rhodes, a deputy national-security adviser, put it to me recently, the longer things dragged on, the greater the risk of a leak, “which would have upended the thing.” Obama adjourned the meeting just after 7 P.M. and said that he would sleep on it.
The next morning, the President met in the Map Room with Tom Donilon, his national-security adviser, Denis McDonough, a deputy adviser, and Brennan. Obama had decided to go with a DEVGRU assault, with McRaven choosing the night. It was too late for a Friday attack, and on Saturday there was excessive cloud cover. On Saturday afternoon, McRaven and Obama spoke on the phone, and McRaven said that the raid would occur on Sunday night. “Godspeed to you and your forces,” Obama told him. “Please pass on to them my personal thanks for their service and the message that I personally will be following this mission very closely.”
n the morning of Sunday, May 1st, White House officials cancelled scheduled visits, ordered sandwich platters from Costco, and transformed the Situation Room into a war room. At eleven o’clock, Obama’s top advisers began gathering around a large conference table. A video link connected them to Panetta, at C.I.A. headquarters, and McRaven, in Afghanistan. (There were at least two other command centers, one inside the Pentagon and one inside the American Embassy in Islamabad.)
Brigadier General Marshall Webb, an assistant commander of JSOC, took a seat at the end of a lacquered table in a small adjoining office and turned on his laptop. He opened multiple chat windows that kept him, and the White House, connected with the other command teams. The office where Webb sat had the only video feed in the White House showing real-time footage of the target, which was being shot by an unarmed RQ 170 drone flying more than fifteen thousand feet above Abbottabad. The JSOC planners, determined to keep the operation as secret as possible, had decided against using additional fighters or bombers. “It just wasn’t worth it,” the special-operations officer told me. The SEALs were on their own.
Obama returned to the White House at two o’clock, after playing nine holes of golf at Andrews Air Force Base. The Black Hawks departed from Jalalabad thirty minutes later. Just before four o’clock, Panetta announced to the group in the Situation Room that the helicopters were approaching Abbottabad. Obama stood up. “I need to watch this,” he said, stepping across the hall into the small office and taking a seat alongside Webb. Vice-President Joseph Biden, Secretary Gates, and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton followed him, as did anyone else who could fit into the office. On the office’s modestly sized LCD screen, helo one—grainy and black-and-white—appeared above the compound, then promptly ran into trouble.
When the helicopter began getting away from the pilot, he pulled back on the cyclic, which controls the pitch of the rotor blades, only to find the aircraft unresponsive. The high walls of the compound and the warm temperatures had caused the Black Hawk to descend inside its own rotor wash—a hazardous aerodynamic situation known as “settling with power.” In North Carolina, this potential problem had not become apparent, because the chain-link fencing used in rehearsals had allowed air to flow freely. A former helicopter pilot with extensive special-operations experience said of the pilot’s situation, “It’s pretty spooky—I’ve been in it myself. The only way to get out of it is to push the cyclic forward and fly out of this vertical silo you’re dropping through. That solution requires altitude. If you’re settling with power at two thousand feet, you’ve got plenty of time to recover. If you’re settling with power at fifty feet, you’re going to hit the ground.”
The pilot scrapped the plan to fast-rope and focussed on getting the aircraft down. He aimed for an animal pen in the western section of the compound. The SEALs on board braced themselves as the tail rotor swung around, scraping the security wall. The pilot jammed the nose forward to drive it into the dirt and prevent his aircraft from rolling onto its side. Cows, chickens, and rabbits scurried. With the Black Hawk pitched at a forty-five-degree angle astride the wall, the crew sent a distress call to the idling Chinooks.
James and the SEALs in helo two watched all this while hovering over the compound’s northeast corner. The second pilot, unsure whether his colleagues were taking fire or experiencing mechanical problems, ditched his plan to hover over the roof. Instead, he landed in a grassy field across the street from the house.
No American was yet inside the residential part of the compound. Mark and his team were inside a downed helicopter at one corner, while James and his team were at the opposite end. The teams had barely been on target for a minute, and the mission was already veering off course.
ternity is defined as the time be tween when you see something go awry and that first voice report,” the special-operations officer said. The officials in Washington viewed the aerial footage and waited anxiously to hear a military communication. The senior adviser to the President compared the experience to watching “the climax of a movie.”
After a few minutes, the twelve SEALs inside helo one recovered their bearings and calmly relayed on the radio that they were proceeding with the raid. They had conducted so many operations over the past nine years that few things caught them off guard. In the months after the raid, the media have frequently suggested that the Abbottabad operation was as challenging as Operation Eagle Claw and the “Black Hawk Down” incident, but the senior Defense Department official told me that “this was not one of three missions. This was one of almost two thousand missions that have been conducted over the last couple of years, night after night.” He likened the routine of evening raids to “mowing the lawn.” On the night of May 1st alone, special-operations forces based in Afghanistan conducted twelve other missions; according to the official, those operations captured or killed between fifteen and twenty targets. “Most of the missions take off and go left,” he said. “This one took off and went right.”
Minutes after hitting the ground, Mark and the other team members began streaming out the side doors of helo one. Mud sucked at their boots as they ran alongside a ten-foot-high wall that enclosed the animal pen. A three-man demolition unit hustled ahead to the pen’s closed metal gate, reached into bags containing explosives, and placed C-4 charges on the hinges. After a loud bang, the door fell open. The nine other SEALs rushed forward, ending up in an alleylike driveway with their backs to the house’s main entrance. They moved down the alley, silenced rifles pressed against their shoulders. Mark hung toward the rear as he established radio communications with the other team. At the end of the driveway, the Americans blew through yet another locked gate and stepped into a courtyard facing the guesthouse, where Abu Ahmed al-Kuwaiti, bin Laden’s courier, lived with his wife and four children.
Three SEALs in front broke off to clear the guesthouse as the remaining nine blasted through another gate and entered an inner courtyard, which faced the main house. When the smaller unit rounded the corner to face the doors of the guesthouse, they spotted Kuwaiti running inside to warn his wife and children. The Americans’ night-vision goggles cast the scene in pixellated shades of emerald green. Kuwaiti, wearing a white shalwar kameez, had grabbed a weapon and was coming back outside when the SEALs opened fire and killed him.
The nine other SEALs, including Mark, formed three-man units for clearing the inner courtyard. The Americans suspected that several more men were in the house: Kuwaiti’s thirty-three-year-old brother, Abrar; bin Laden’s sons Hamza and Khalid; and bin Laden himself. One SEAL unit had no sooner trod on the paved patio at the house’s front entrance when Abrar—a stocky, mustachioed man in a cream-colored shalwar kameez—appeared with an AK-47. He was shot in the chest and killed, as was his wife, Bushra, who was standing, unarmed, beside him.
utside the compound’s walls, Ahmed, the translator, patrolled the dirt road in front of bin Laden’s house, as if he were a plainclothes Pakistani police officer. He looked the part, wearing a shalwar kameez atop a flak jacket. He, the dog Cairo, and four SEALs were responsible for closing off the perimeter of the house while James and six other SEALs—the contingent that was supposed to have dropped onto the roof—moved inside. For the team patrolling the perimeter, the first fifteen minutes passed without incident. Neighbors undoubtedly heard the low-flying helicopters, the sound of one crashing, and the sporadic explosions and gunfire that ensued, but nobody came outside. One local took note of the tumult in a Twitter post: “Helicopter hovering above Abbottabad at 1 AM (is a rare event).”
Eventually, a few curious Pakistanis approached to inquire about the commotion on the other side of the wall. “Go back to your houses,” Ahmed said, in Pashto, as Cairo stood watch. “There is a security operation under way.” The locals went home, none of them suspecting that they had talked to an American. When journalists descended on Bilal Town in the coming days, one resident told a reporter, “I saw soldiers emerging from the helicopters and advancing toward the house. Some of them instructed us in chaste Pashto to turn off the lights and stay inside.”
Meanwhile, James, the squadron commander, had breached one wall, crossed a section of the yard covered with trellises, breached a second wall, and joined up with the SEALs from helo one, who were entering the ground floor of the house. What happened next is not precisely clear. “I can tell you that there was a time period of almost twenty to twenty-five minutes where we really didn’t know just exactly what was going on,” Panetta said later, on “PBS NewsHour.”
Until this moment, the operation had been monitored by dozens of defense, intelligence, and Administration officials watching the drone’s video feed. The SEALs were not wearing helmet cams, contrary to a widely cited report by CBS. None of them had any previous knowledge of the house’s floor plan, and they were further jostled by the awareness that they were possibly minutes away from ending the costliest manhunt in American history; as a result, some of their recollections—on which this account is based—may be imprecise and, thus, subject to dispute.
As Abrar’s children ran for cover, the SEALs began clearing the first floor of the main house, room by room. Though the Americans had thought that the house might be booby-trapped, the presence of kids at the compound suggested otherwise. “You can only be hyper-vigilant for so long,” the special-operations officer said. “Did bin Laden go to sleep every night thinking, The next night they’re coming? Of course not. Maybe for the first year or two. But not now.” Nevertheless, security precautions were in place. A locked metal gate blocked the base of the staircase leading to the second floor, making the downstairs room feel like a cage.
After blasting through the gate with C-4 charges, three SEALs marched up the stairs. Midway up, they saw bin Laden’s twenty-three-year-old son, Khalid, craning his neck around the corner. He then appeared at the top of the staircase with an AK-47. Khalid, who wore a white T-shirt with an overstretched neckline and had short hair and a clipped beard, fired down at the Americans. (The counterterrorism official claims that Khalid was unarmed, though still a threat worth taking seriously. “You have an adult male, late at night, in the dark, coming down the stairs at you in an Al Qaeda house—your assumption is that you’re encountering a hostile.”) At least two of the SEALs shot back and killed Khalid. According to the booklets that the SEALs carried, up to five adult males were living inside the compound. Three of them were now dead; the fourth, bin Laden’s son Hamza, was not on the premises. The final person was bin Laden.
Before the mission commenced, the SEALs had created a checklist of code words that had a Native American theme. Each code word represented a different stage of the mission: leaving Jalalabad, entering Pakistan, approaching the compound, and so on. “Geronimo” was to signify that bin Laden had been found.
Three SEALs shuttled past Khalid’s body and blew open another metal cage, which obstructed the staircase leading to the third floor. Bounding up the unlit stairs, they scanned the railed landing. On the top stair, the lead SEAL swivelled right; with his night-vision goggles, he discerned that a tall, rangy man with a fist-length beard was peeking out from behind a bedroom door, ten feet away. The SEAL instantly sensed that it was Crankshaft. (The counterterrorism official asserts that the SEAL first saw bin Laden on the landing, and fired but missed.)
The Americans hurried toward the bedroom door. The first SEAL pushed it open. Two of bin Laden’s wives had placed themselves in front of him. Amal al-Fatah, bin Laden’s fifth wife, was screaming in Arabic. She motioned as if she were going to charge; the SEAL lowered his sights and shot her once, in the calf. Fearing that one or both women were wearing suicide jackets, he stepped forward, wrapped them in a bear hug, and drove them aside. He would almost certainly have been killed had they blown themselves up, but by blanketing them he would have absorbed some of the blast and potentially saved the two SEALs behind him. In the end, neither woman was wearing an explosive vest.
A second SEAL stepped into the room and trained the infrared laser of his M4 on bin Laden’s chest. The Al Qaeda chief, who was wearing a tan shalwar kameez and a prayer cap on his head, froze; he was unarmed. “There was never any question of detaining or capturing him—it wasn’t a split-second decision. No one wanted detainees,” the special-operations officer told me. (The Administration maintains that had bin Laden immediately surrendered he could have been taken alive.) Nine years, seven months, and twenty days after September 11th, an American was a trigger pull from ending bin Laden’s life. The first round, a 5.56-mm. bullet, struck bin Laden in the chest. As he fell backward, the SEAL fired a second round into his head, just above his left eye. On his radio, he reported, “For God and country—Geronimo, Geronimo, Geronimo.” After a pause, he added, “Geronimo E.K.I.A.”—“enemy killed in action.”
Hearing this at the White House, Obama pursed his lips, and said solemnly, to no one in particular, “We got him.”
elaxing his hold on bin Laden’s two wives, the first SEAL placed the women in flex cuffs and led them downstairs. Two of his colleagues, meanwhile, ran upstairs with a nylon body bag. They unfurled it, knelt down on either side of bin Laden, and placed the body inside the bag. Eighteen minutes had elapsed since the DEVGRU team landed. For the next twenty minutes, the mission shifted to an intelligence-gathering operation.
Four men scoured the second floor, plastic bags in hand, collecting flash drives, CDs, DVDs, and computer hardware from the room, which had served, in part, as bin Laden’s makeshift media studio. In the coming weeks, a C.I.A.-led task force examined the files and determined that bin Laden had remained far more involved in the operational activities of Al Qaeda than many American officials had thought. He had been developing plans to assassinate Obama and Petraeus, to pull off an extravagant September 11th anniversary attack, and to attack American trains. The SEALs also found an archive of digital pornography. “We find it on all these guys, whether they’re in Somalia, Iraq, or Afghanistan,” the special-operations officer said. Bin Laden’s gold-threaded robes, worn during his video addresses, hung behind a curtain in the media room.
Outside, the Americans corralled the women and children—each of them bound in flex cuffs—and had them sit against an exterior wall that faced the second, undamaged Black Hawk. The lone fluent Arabic speaker on the assault team questioned them. Nearly all the children were under the age of ten. They seemed to have no idea about the tenant upstairs, other than that he was “an old guy.” None of the women confirmed that the man was bin Laden, though one of them kept referring to him as “the sheikh.” When the rescue Chinook eventually arrived, a medic stepped out and knelt over the corpse. He injected a needle into bin Laden’s body and extracted two bone-marrow samples. More DNA was taken with swabs. One of the bone-marrow samples went into the Black Hawk. The other went into the Chinook, along with bin Laden’s body.
Next, the SEALs needed to destroy the damaged Black Hawk. The pilot, armed with a hammer that he kept for such situations, smashed the instrument panel, the radio, and the other classified fixtures inside the cockpit. Then the demolition unit took over. They placed explosives near the avionics system, the communications gear, the engine, and the rotor head. “You’re not going to hide the fact that it’s a helicopter,” the special-operations officer said. “But you want to make it unusable.” The SEALs placed extra C-4 charges under the carriage, rolled thermite grenades inside the copter’s body, and then backed up. Helo one burst into flames while the demolition team boarded the Chinook. The women and children, who were being left behind for the Pakistani authorities, looked puzzled, scared, and shocked as they watched the SEALs board the helicopters. Amal, bin Laden’s wife, continued her harangue. Then, as a giant fire burned inside the compound walls, the Americans flew away.
n the Situation Room, Obama said, “I’m not going to be happy until those guys get out safe.” After thirty-eight minutes inside the compound, the two SEAL teams had to make the long flight back to Afghanistan. The Black Hawk was low on gas, and needed to rendezvous with the Chinook at the refuelling point that was near the Afghan border—but still inside Pakistan. Filling the gas tank took twenty-five minutes. At one point, Biden, who had been fingering a rosary, turned to Mullen, the Joint Chiefs chairman. “We should all go to Mass tonight,” he said.
The helicopters landed back in Jalalabad around 3 A.M.; McRaven and the C.I.A. station chief met the team on the tarmac. A pair of SEALs unloaded the body bag and unzipped it so that McRaven and the C.I.A. officer could see bin Laden’s corpse with their own eyes. Photographs were taken of bin Laden’s face and then of his outstretched body. Bin Laden was believed to be about six feet four, but no one had a tape measure to confirm the body’s length. So one SEAL, who was six feet tall, lay beside the corpse: it measured roughly four inches longer than the American. Minutes later, McRaven appeared on the teleconference screen in the Situation Room and confirmed that bin Laden’s body was in the bag. The corpse was sent to Bagram.
All along, the SEALs had planned to dump bin Laden’s corpse into the sea—a blunt way of ending the bin Laden myth. They had successfully pulled off a similar scheme before. During a DEVGRU helicopter raid inside Somalia in September, 2009, SEALs had killed Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan, one of East Africa’s top Al Qaeda leaders; Nabhan’s corpse was then flown to a ship in the Indian Ocean, given proper Muslim rites, and thrown overboard. Before taking that step for bin Laden, however, John Brennan made a call. Brennan, who had been a C.I.A. station chief in Riyadh, phoned a former counterpart in Saudi intelligence. Brennan told the man what had occurred in Abbottabad and informed him of the plan to deposit bin Laden’s remains at sea. As Brennan knew, bin Laden’s relatives were still a prominent family in the Kingdom, and Osama had once been a Saudi citizen. Did the Saudi government have any interest in taking the body? “Your plan sounds like a good one,” the Saudi replied.
At dawn, bin Laden was loaded into the belly of a flip-wing V-22 Osprey, accompanied by a JSOC liaison officer and a security detail of military police. The Osprey flew south, destined for the deck of the U.S.S. Carl Vinson—a thousand-foot-long nuclear-powered aircraft carrier sailing in the Arabian Sea, off the Pakistani coast. The Americans, yet again, were about to traverse Pakistani airspace without permission. Some officials worried that the Pakistanis, stung by the humiliation of the unilateral raid in Abbottabad, might restrict the Osprey’s access. The airplane ultimately landed on the Vinson without incident.
Bin Laden’s body was washed, wrapped in a white burial shroud, weighted, and then slipped inside a bag. The process was done “in strict conformance with Islamic precepts and practices,” Brennan later told reporters. The JSOC liaison, the military-police contingent, and several sailors placed the shrouded body on an open-air elevator, and rode down with it to the lower level, which functions as a hangar for airplanes. From a height of between twenty and twenty-five feet above the waves, they heaved the corpse into the water.
Back in Abbottabad, residents of Bilal Town and dozens of journalists converged on bin Laden’s compound, and the morning light clarified some of the confusion from the previous night. Black soot from the detonated Black Hawk charred the wall of the animal pen. Part of the tail hung over the wall. It was clear that a military raid had taken place there. “I’m glad no one was hurt in the crash, but, on the other hand, I’m sort of glad we left the helicopter there,” the special-operations officer said. “It quiets the conspiracy mongers out there and instantly lends credibility. You believe everything else instantly, because there’s a helicopter sitting there.”
fter the raid, Pakistan’s political leadership engaged in frantic damage control. In the Washington Post, President Asif Ali Zardari wrote that bin Laden “was not anywhere we had anticipated he would be, but now he is gone,” adding that “a decade of cooperation and partnership between the United States and Pakistan led up to the elimination of Osama bin Laden.”
Pakistani military officials reacted more cynically. They arrested at least five Pakistanis for helping the C.I.A., including the physician who ran the immunization drive in Abbottabad. And several Pakistani media outlets, including the Nation—a jingoistic English-language newspaper that is considered a mouthpiece for Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency, or I.S.I.—published what they claimed was the name of the C.I.A.’s station chief in Islamabad. (Shireen Mazari, a former editor of the Nation, once told me, “Our interests and the Americans’ interests don’t coincide.”) The published name was incorrect, and the C.I.A. officer opted to stay.
The proximity of bin Laden’s house to the Pakistan Military Academy raised the possibility that the military, or the I.S.I., had helped protect bin Laden. How could Al Qaeda’s chief live so close to the academy without at least some officers knowing about it? Suspicion grew after the Times reported that at least one cell phone recovered from bin Laden’s house contained contacts for senior militants belonging to Harakat-ul-Mujahideen, a jihadi group that has had close ties to the I.S.I. Although American officials have stated that Pakistani officials must have helped bin Laden hide in Abbottabad, definitive evidence has not yet been presented.
Bin Laden’s death provided the White House with the symbolic victory it needed to begin phasing troops out of Afghanistan. Seven weeks later, Obama announced a timetable for withdrawal. Even so, U.S. counterterrorism activities inside Pakistan—that is, covert operations conducted by the C.I.A. and JSOC—are not expected to diminish anytime soon. Since May 2nd, there have been more than twenty drone strikes in North and South Waziristan, including one that allegedly killed Ilyas Kashmiri, a top Al Qaeda leader, while he was sipping tea in an apple orchard.
The success of the bin Laden raid has sparked a conversation inside military and intelligence circles: Are there other terrorists worth the risk of another helicopter assault in a Pakistani city? “There are people out there that, if we could find them, we would go after them,” Cartwright told me. He mentioned Ayman al-Zawahiri, the new leader of Al Qaeda, who is believed to be in Pakistan, and Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born cleric in Yemen. Cartwright emphasized that “going after them” didn’t necessarily mean another DEVGRU raid. The special-operations officer spoke more boldly. He believes that a precedent has been set for more unilateral raids in the future. “Folks now realize we can weather it,” he said. The senior adviser to the President said that “penetrating other countries’ sovereign airspace covertly is something that’s always available for the right mission and the right gain.” Brennan told me, “The confidence we have in the capabilities of the U.S. military is, without a doubt, even stronger after this operation.”
On May 6th, Al Qaeda confirmed bin Laden’s death and released a statement congratulating “the Islamic nation” on “the martyrdom of its good son Osama.” The authors promised Americans that “their joy will turn to sorrow and their tears will mix with blood.” That day, President Obama travelled to Fort Campbell, Kentucky, where the 160th is based, to meet the DEVGRU unit and the pilots who pulled off the raid. The SEALs, who had returned home from Afghanistan earlier in the week, flew in from Virginia. Biden, Tom Donilon, and a dozen other national-security advisers came along.
McRaven greeted Obama on the tarmac. (They had met at the White House a few days earlier—the President had presented McRaven with a tape measure.) McRaven led the President and his team into a one-story building on the other side of the base. They walked into a windowless room with shabby carpets, fluorescent lights, and three rows of metal folding chairs. McRaven, Brian, the pilots from the 160th, and James took turns briefing the President. They had set up a three-dimensional model of bin Laden’s compound on the floor and, waving a red laser pointer, traced their maneuvers inside. A satellite image of the compound was displayed on a wall, along with a map showing the flight routes into and out of Pakistan. The briefing lasted about thirty-five minutes. Obama wanted to know how Ahmed had kept locals at bay; he also inquired about the fallen Black Hawk and whether above-average temperatures in Abbottabad had contributed to the crash. (The Pentagon is conducting a formal investigation of the accident.)
When James, the squadron commander, spoke, he started by citing all the forward operating bases in eastern Afghanistan that had been named for SEALs killed in combat. “Everything we have done for the last ten years prepared us for this,” he told Obama. The President was “in awe of these guys,” Ben Rhodes, the deputy national-security adviser, who travelled with Obama, said. “It was an extraordinary base visit,” he added. “They knew he had staked his Presidency on this. He knew they staked their lives on it.”
As James talked about the raid, he mentioned Cairo’s role. “There was a dog?” Obama interrupted. James nodded and said that Cairo was in an adjoining room, muzzled, at the request of the Secret Service.
“I want to meet that dog,” Obama said.
“If you want to meet the dog, Mr. President, I advise you to bring treats,” James joked. Obama went over to pet Cairo, but the dog’s muzzle was left on.
Afterward, Obama and his advisers went into a second room, down the hall, where others involved in the raid—including logisticians, crew chiefs, and SEAL alternates—had assembled. Obama presented the team with a Presidential Unit Citation and said, “Our intelligence professionals did some amazing work. I had fifty-fifty confidence that bin Laden was there, but I had one-hundred-per-cent confidence in you guys. You are, literally, the finest small-fighting force that has ever existed in the world.” The raiding team then presented the President with an American flag that had been on board the rescue Chinook. Measuring three feet by five, the flag had been stretched, ironed, and framed. The SEALs and the pilots had signed it on the back; an inscription on the front read, “From the Joint Task Force Operation Neptune’s Spear, 01 May 2011: ‘For God and country. Geronimo.’ ” Obama promised to put the gift “somewhere private and meaningful to me.” Before the President returned to Washington, he posed for photographs with each team member and spoke with many of them, but he left one thing unsaid. He never asked who fired the kill shot, and the SEALs never volunteered to tell him. ♦
To get more of The New Yorker's signature mix of politics, culture and the arts: Subscribe now

Friday, July 29, 2011

Oh, Britannia, how you have changed
Andrew Sullivan   TIMES OF LONDON


When Andrew Sullivan left Britain for America it was a dreary, divided land. On his return he finds political turmoil – yet a nation at peace with itself

What should they know of England who only England know? That was Rudyard Kipling’s question in a famous piece of breezy, patriotic poetry, as he called upon the “winds of the world” to celebrate the triumph of Britishness across the globe. Of course, those who have known only England can know her pretty well, as another great Victorian, GK Chesterton, observed — “travel narrows the mind” — but a bit of perspective can sometimes help. Mine, perhaps, is a particularly strange one: a life lived in England for 21 continuous years and then one in America for a continuous 26.

By a quirk of fate — my HIV status severely restricted my travel under a retrograde 1980s US law now mercifully repealed — my visits home were rare, brief and often anxious. The last was five years ago. But this time, green card finally in hand, I allow myself the time to remain; and rest; and unhurriedly watch and listen to the country I once called home.
I have a blur of impressions, mixed with the odd feeling of being in a movie in which you are fast-forwarded a quarter-century and everyone suddenly ages. Those with brown hair now have white; your old garden has been sold to make room for another house; the nephew I always tended to think of as a toddler is now my height; a new nephew, the spitting image of my brother at four, is now glancing up under a haze of eyelashes to reassure the strange man with the enormous beard: “I know you’re my uncle.”
The stops on the train journey from my Sussex home to London are exactly the same, almost a long-forgotten mantra of Englishness to me: Hurst Green, Oxted, Woldingham, Upper Warlingham, Riddlesdown, Sanderstead ... The names reassure. And after you’ve lived in America, the sheer depth of each tiny stop, the generations that have lived there or near there for centuries, the overwhelming sense of real place you feel is something I once took easily for granted. Now it has the shock of the old, a sudden remembrance that this little island really does have an identity, a character.
And what is that character? The longer I have been away, the clearer it has become. It is prosaic and pragmatic; comfy and yet rude; resigned, yet not in any way depressed. I left at the crux of the Thatcher struggle, after teen years in the dreary dreadfulness of the 1970s, when this country truly was at war with itself, when the ideological divide was profound, when north was pitted against south and when “society”, far from being “big”, was rumoured to be nonexistent. I come back for a roaring, very British scandal and a culture far calmer, a divide far narrower and an identity much more settled. Everything is different and yet everything is also very much the same. Everyone is grumbling, but, if you will forgive a generalisation based purely on personal impressions, it seems a country that still makes sense; that has come to terms with itself; a country that, unlike my new home, America, is not in the midst of a cold civil war.

My friend the American columnist David Brooks put it this way recently: “Usually when I travel from Washington to Britain I move from less gloom to more gloom. But this time the mood is reversed. The British political system is basically functional while the American system is not.” The past few weeks may not seem exactly that to many Brits, but I couldn’t agree more.

The notion that England could change out of all recognition and yet remain the same never rang so true Take the prime minister, a man only vaguely known in America and one individual I did not meet along the way at Oxford. As I left Britain, the middle-class revolution was in full swing. In the Tory party, first Ted Heath and then Margaret Thatcher had ushered in what seemed to be a new era of petit bourgeois strivers, capped off by the very non-Oxford, nonEstablishment (and highly underrated) John Major. Who do I see in the Commons now? A slightly chubby, ruddy-faced Old Etonian, an almost Platonic ideal of a Tory prime minister.
Part Macmillan, part Baldwin, he confuses at first. Can a member of the Bullingdon club really still be running the country? I search to recognise the accent, something I had learnt to recognise almost instantly in order to recoil and retreat.

But I can’t quite place it. It’s got lost somewhere in the middle of the country, somewhere such as, say, Chipping Norton, a blend of easy entitlement and learnt engagement with the masses. And what, one wonders, could be more quintessentially Tory than that?
The scandal he was blundering through was like the Profumo affair without the sex. It’s all really light corruption by global standards, the air-kissing sleaze of too-cosy dinner parties and old friends, of coppers on the soft take, in pursuit of the old naughty-vicars-type gossip in the tabloids (only now they’re footballers) and a competitive press all eager to bring rivals down. Not exactly Watergate, I’m sorry to inform you. Or Abu Ghraib.
Once upon a time, the News of the World may actually have shocked people. Now, the English are forced to manufacture the shock on a Sunday morning to titillate themselves with nothing but prurience. Even the skulduggery has gone out of it. There’s nothing clever or naughty or admirably devious about hacking a phone to find out the intimate details of someone’s personal life. It’s too easy. But if the methods had changed, that old English instinct — the desire to take uppity people down — is the same. Except it’s not even uppity or successful people now; all you have to do to stir the envy of the masses is to appear for five minutes on a reality show.
In the end, it seemed to me that the scandal was yet another sign that the old Establishment was not just still running things but was resurgent. For what was this scandal about in the end but the toppling of the foreign interloper, the dirty digger, the man who in front of a parliamentary committee had brought up the subject of Gallipoli — yes, Gallipoli! — as a resentment that still stung?
Just to make me feel suddenly swept back a generation, I pick up Private Eye to wallow in a thoroughly fantastic orgy of nostalgia and gloat. Now there’s an institution that has not changed one iota. Yes! That photo of Andrew Neil in a vest! Yes! A Sylvie Krin romance novel — but now not about Charles and Diana but Wendi and “Lupert”. From Monty Python’s Asian version of Erizabeth L to ninja wife Wendi Deng yelling: “Shurrup, Lupert, and risten!” And has anyone noticed the remarkable similarity between Rebekah Brooks and King James II? Oh joy.
This was another turn of the English wheel, as one cliquish Establishment circles and replaces another: at once recognisable and then oddly not. I mean, who is this beautiful blonde carefully dismembering a vanguard of the right-wing press on a parliamentary committee? Oh, it’s Louise Mensch — a Conservative MP. The mind reels. Really?

And then you see the quiet social revolution begun by Tony Blair and cemented by Cameron. Politics is not merely about old white men any more. As Washington’s entire Congress includes three openly gay representatives, the Tories alone have 13 (if you’re not really counting). Soho, once a lovely, run-down redoubt of drunken, literate hacks, is now pulsating with gay muscles and foreign accents. The chairwoman of the Tories is a Muslim, an idea that would give John Boehner, Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives, a fit of the vapours.

I go to the East End for a dinner and arrive via a lift in what looks like a factory into a vast New York-style loft, to find it is the Shoreditch version of Soho House. Then, a sentence you never expect in Britain: “Of course, we have gluten-free options.” I suppose I should not register any great shock at all this. But much of it was as unthinkable a quarter-century ago as a giant ferris wheel towering over the Commons.

And yet I also see some of the same things as Orwell did. The ridiculously heavy currency; the garishness of street advertising; the terror, after America’s 55mph freeways, of being driven at breakneck speed down a winding country road (which looks more like a green tunnel carved from the surrounding trees). The gentleness of nature here. New England comes close, but the winters there create a hardiness in the landscape you don’t see much in England. Here there is delicacy amid the damp; ferns in copses; oak trees in meadows.

My father and sister can recognise the tiniest varieties of garden plants from a long distance; my brother will see a speck in the sky and instantly know what kind of bird it is. Most Americans don’t really know flowers or care. But to know England is to know gardening, which is an utterly different thing from ranching or landscaping.

Gardening, like Englishness, is about being home; it is about tending to things, not remaking them; it is about learning to bend with nature, not to master it; it is a function of a culture that knows what it is and is prepared to stop for a few minutes to enjoy it. My father still loves pottering about in his, as I remember his father carefully pruning his rose bushes. And in my middle age I suddenly found myself with the urge to garden as well. All those afternoons with Gardeners’ Question Time humming in the background on the radio had proved their worth.
And the tiny things. I’d forgotten how it is possible for a shower to last 40 seconds and cover only half a street. I’d forgotten that it is possible to be chilled in July. I am forced to remember that the proper response to “How are you?” is not “Fine” but “Not too bad” and “Can’t complain”. And the general low-level alcoholism of almost everyone is as recognisable today as ever, with a slight twist. You can see across a pub now and not be scanning through a fog of smoke. Hence what struck me as a new and lovely tradition: the spilling-out onto the pavement of nicotine-craving boozers, in an impromptu alcoholic happening.

My only gripe: the horrible new English way of saying “yeah?” at the end of a sentence, where an “eh?” would once have sufficed. And yes, I know about chavs. They were always with us, in one form or another.
Then there are the things you cannot quite believe are still around. Bruce Forsyth. Seriously? And the post-everything shallowness, dressed up as snark, of the drivel written by a Toby Young; or the pious, mind-deadening leftism of a Polly Toynbee. Like small balls of powder in a badly mixed custard, these old oddities still shock the palate.
Race is another obvious quiet English revolution. I remember as a young boy some mutterings among my Clapham grandparents about how many “coloureds” there were. I remember the Brixton riots. My era was of My Beautiful Laundrette and the Anti-Nazi League. And I know there has been a vast conversation about whether multiculturalism and Englishness are compatible. But in my everyday wanderings, it seemed obvious to me that Englishness had simply added a few colour wheels. Of course, I’m talking only of London. But I felt no racial tension here — nothing like what was palpable in New York and Washington only a decade ago.
My sister dragged me to the Primark in Oxford Street and I was immediately hurled into what felt like a deafening, soul-crushing, overcrowded Arab souk with fluorescent lighting. But as your pupils adjusted to the banishment of all darkness, you realised they were all looking for bargains; and their overheard conversations, if I closed my eyes, struck me as instantly recognisable. Yep: that famous English cheapness. Still here. But in a burqa. The notion that England could change out of all recognition and yet remain the same — Orwell’s memorable expression — never rang so true.
And there does seem to me to be a national conversation in a way there sadly isn’t in the US. Various institutions, such as the BBC, ensure it. Nothing in America has the clout or audience of the Today programme, for example. There are no cities with the vibrant, clashing newspapers of London. I begin to see why blogging — endemic in the US — has not been so successful here. The BBC provides the news ballast and the papers add the competitive bias. The crucial niche carved by blogs in the US — the personal writing, the strong opinions — is already occupied here. It’s called the press. And for all its obvious faults, the Beeb remains a cohering cultural presence, like the West End theatre. Not so long ago, I would have been all for abolishing it. Not any more. It adds to Britain’s cultural continuity, and if you have ever been subjected to the screeching, ugly propaganda of Fox News, or the smothering smugness of its liberal rival, MSNBC, you’ll appreciate it some more.

What’s gone, of course, is the C of E. Religion itself appears to have been wiped from the cultural map in Britain in ways unimaginable in faithful America. This, to my mind, is a tragedy, for a society without some relationship to the transcendent can become simply boorish and myopic. But, again, I see the merits of secularism more clearly now. It takes constant exposure to American fundamentalism to feel relieved by the prosaic dismissal of the spiritual by the English. And again, I wonder whether this has really, truly changed. Anglicanism, as it was founded by the first Queen Elizabeth, was always about the blurring of doctrinal difference, the aversion to looking into others’ souls, the modesty of a limited spiritual imagination epitomised by the Book of Common Prayer.

An old don of mine once remarked that he supported the Church of England as a bulwark against religion. He had a point. And, yes, I know evangelicalism is on the march in England. But take it from me: it has a huge, long way to go. And an occasional, real, vibrant debate about what is existentially true could add some colour to the shades of grey in England’s tepid spiritual conversation.

But the central crisis of my youth — that of English identity — seems to me to have resolved itself. No one but a Simon Heffer even faintly has nostalgia for global power any more, let alone empire. The whole question of Europe has palpably calmed — lulled by the very English compromise of being in the EU but not truly of it. Thatcher was right about the euro, wasn’t she?
And what’s left feels like someone emerging from midlife crisis into a rather comfortable second wind, one in which illusions of grandeur have morphed into the modest pride of simply being who you are. For most of you, I imagine this cultural settlement is background white noise by now. To me, it’s deafening. After losing an empire, England has finally found a role: just being England.

As I wandered again through the Sussex woodlands I retreated to in my boyhood, and imagined the bluebells sweeping like a lush carpet under the freshness of the new spring green, that felt good enough to me. More than good enough. The Great in Britain remains — right in front of you. Sometimes it just takes a little time and distance to recognise it.


































Sunday, July 24, 2011

Amy Winehouse: 'She was a sweet, tiny thing with this huge great voice'At just 14 she started to write her own songs - stardom soon followed. But so too did a fatal attraction to drugs and drink. The UK Guardian

Up until May this year there had been hopes Winehouse had found a way back from the abyss. She was set to begin work on a new album. Photograph: Dave Hogan/Getty Images

It made painful viewing. Amy Winehouse, the tiny woman with the contralto voice, was mumbling her way through some of her most famous lyrics and managing only a few strained notes as she stumbled around a stage in Belgrade, apparently drunk.

The Serbian gig was the first of what was supposed to be a 12-day European comeback tour. But the 20,000 fans who had paid around £40 a ticket to see the 27-year-old booed her and many left the venue in disgust during the 90-minute show, as the singer repeatedly dropped her microphone and left the stage, leaving her backing band to try to fill the gaps.
The next two dates, festivals in Istanbul and Athens, were swiftly cancelled by her management who had reportedly been fighting to keep her clear of alcohol, searching her hotel rooms and giving strict instructions to staff that she was not to be served drink. Winehouse, who claimed last October that she had been free of hard drugs for three years, had checked out of London's Priory clinic earlier that month, promising to continue alcohol addiction treatment as an outpatient.

The whole tour and all scheduled performances were cancelled on 23 June. Just a month later, the troubled, talented young singer was found dead at her Camden Square home.

Her father Mitch, a cab driver who had fought for years to keep his daughter away from the "druggies and the hangers-on" who he believed preyed on her, was on a plane to New York where he was due to perform at a jazz festival. He had repeatedly and publicly warned that he believed Amy would die unless she curbed her use of class-A drugs. She suffered from emphysema and her father told one magazine in 2008 that she had received advice that she was putting her life in danger by continuing to smoke cigarettes and hard drugs. "The doctors have told her if she goes back to smoking drugs it won't just ruin her voice, it will kill her."

At the time he appealed: "I'm saying to those drug dealers, and they know who they are, if they are supplying crack to Amy, then they've got to take responsibility."

Amy Winehouse was born to a Jewish family in Southgate, London, and as she put it in an early interview, "raised on jazz". As a little girl she loved to dress up and sing for the family and her neighbours. She got her first guitar at the age of 13 and started writing songs at 14. "I loved James Taylor and Carole King, Sarah Vaughan. But all the music around then was a bit dull, so I just started writing music to challenge myself, to write my own stuff," she said in one of her early interviews.
"It's very jazz-influenced but hip-hop- and beat-driven; everything I listened to from the old to the new."

By 2001 the teenager was singing with a jazz band when her then-boyfriend, soul singer Tyler James, sent off her demo to a management company. She was signed by Simon Fuller's 19 Management and kept an "industry secret" until she found herself at the centre of a bidding war between rival record companies that saw her as a perfect foil to the reality TV music show winners who were dominating the charts.
Her first album, Frank, was released in 2003 to critical acclaim but it was her second album, Back to Black in 2006, that shot her to international fame. It reached number one in the UK and number six in the US, selling 10 million copies and winning five Grammy awards. The album's hit single Rehab, with the line: "They tried to make me go to rehab. I said, 'No, no, no'" became the prescient anthem that followed Winehouse's life from then on, as she quickly became a poster girl for the shock rock'n'roll lifestyle.

Almost overnight it seemed that the 5ft 3in singer with the cheeky eye make-up, bouffant beehive and the ever-present cigarette was on a destructive path. "The more insecure I feel, the more I drink," she said, when asked about her rapid weight loss, adding: "And the more insecure I feel, the bigger my beehive gets."

In 2007 Winehouse married Blake Fielder-Civil, a part-time gopher for a music video company with whom she had been having an on-off tempestuous relationship. His name joined her growing collection of tattoos – this one on her breast. The same year she was hospitalised for what was at first described as "exhaustion". She admitted later that the problem was a drug overdose.

The couple's relationship became fodder for the tabloids as they lurched from crisis to crisis before their divorce in 2009. Several video recordings made by Fielder-Civil ended up being sold on to tabloids, including one of him goading her to sing a racist song and another of Winehouse asleep surrounded by the paraphernalia of drug abuse.

Her mother Janis said in 2008: "I have known for a long time that my daughter has problems. We're watching her kill herself slowly. It's like watching a car crash – this person throwing these gifts away. I've already come to terms with her dead. I've steeled myself to ask her on what ground she wants to be buried, in which cemetery."

Until May there had been hopes that Winehouse might have been finding her way back from the abyss. She was bundled off to the Caribbean island of St Lucia where she was to work on a new album. There, hoped her family and friends, she would stay away from the drug dealers she knew so well in London. Sightings of Winehouse looking healthier suggested the plan was working, with the head of Universal Music, Lucian Grange, quoted as saying the new material was sounding "sensational".

The reservoir of goodwill in the industry towards Winehouse was enormous. She had been a huge trailblazing force in the music.
Spin magazine music editor Charles Aaron was quoted as saying: "Amy Winehouse was the Nirvana moment for all these women. They can all be traced back to her in terms of attitude, musical styles or fashion."

But last week the optimism began to evaporate. Veteran singer Tony Bennett, who recorded a song with her for his new album of duets, said he was "praying" for Winehouse.
In an interview with the Guardian, Bennett said: "Of all the contemporary artists I know, she has the most natural jazz voice, but I'm worried about her and I'm praying for her.
"She'd help everyone by sobering up and cleaning up her spirituality."

As fans and friends expressed overwhelming sadness at the loss of the singer, a member of her entourage told the Observer: "She was just like a really sweet little girl.

"Just a sweet tiny thing with a huge great voice. Maybe we all expected this would happen; maybe we all hoped someone else could stop it."

Monday, July 11, 2011

Roseanne’s New Reality

Roseanne Barr’s reality series, ‘Roseanne’s Nuts,’ marks the scandalous comedian’s return to the public eye after a carefully orchestrated retreat. She talks to Kate Aurthur about her sanity, Kabbalah, her children, the death of upward mobility, and Michele Bachmann.

Chris McPherson Newsweek
Near the end of our more than three-hour interview, Roseanne Barr cried. She was talking about how all of her five children—from the 40-year-old daughter she gave up for adoption when she was 18, to the three children she had with her first husband, to 15-year-old Buck, whom she had at age 43 with her third husband—have turned out to be good people.

“All my kids, they suffered a lot,” Barr said. “The best thing to me is when people at Buck’s school, they say—,” her eyes filled with tears—“‘You know, your son is so wonderful of a person.’” She began crying. “They just say, ‘Your son is such a great person.’ That’s just the greatest thing. And all my kids and my grandkids and stuff. I just have a great life.” She cried harder, and wiped her eyes. “They’re decent. Despite all of it. And that’s, like, man, that’s a big victory for me. The biggest. That’s the one that matters. When I look in the mirror or whatever, I’m like, ‘Whew—dodged a big fucking bullet there.’”



Barr continued, choked-up. “When your kids are looked up to by people you admire, that’s better than fucking 10 sitcoms. For me to have my kids come through fire—and they did. Thank God. Thank God, Allah, Buddha, Jesus. Everybody.” She composed herself, sniffled, and looked up, brightening. “That’s a good ending!”

Let’s use it as a beginning instead.

The 58-year-old comedian is launching a 16-episode reality series, Roseanne’s Nuts, on Lifetime on Wednesday. It shows her new life on a macadamia nut farm on the Big Island of Hawaii, which she bought in 2007 and moved to fulltime last year. She lives with her boyfriend of eight years, Johnny Argent, and teenaged Buck, with her adult children and grandchildren around, too. They’re all on the show, which Barr said is like “Larry David meets reality.” Meaning, it’s not exactly reality? “It’s based in reality,” she said. “But it’s funny. It’s not the Kardashians.”

Fellow comedian Sandra Bernhard—who became friends with Barr more than 20 years ago at legendary agent Sue Mengers’ house, and ended up being cast on Roseanne as a result—will appear on an episode. The show flew her and Phyllis Diller to Hawaii to hang out with Barr. “It was totally unlike any reality show that I’ve ever seen—the conversation was at the very highest level, but still really funny and crazy,” said Bernhard. “It kind of captured the brilliance of real conversation without being boring, pedantic, and a bummer.”

Rob Sharenow, Lifetime’s executive vice president of programming, said: “She’s not someone who can fake it. I don’t think that’s within her DNA—I think she has to be who she is.” Nor is he concerned that the over-saturated market of celebreality is a genre that hasn’t had a hit in awhile. “Roseanne is by far the biggest star to ever do a reality show. She is not a D-lister desperate for fame or looking to make a quick buck.”

No, she’s not desperate, and God knows she doesn’t need the bucks (she made $1 million per Roseanne episode for years, which was only part of her income at the series’ height). Strategically, 2011 has been Barr’s year of peeking out from behind the wall she had built around her and Buck to normalize their lives. She filmed Roseanne’s Nuts; her third memoir, Roseannearchy, was released in January and will come out in paperback in the fall; and in May she wrote a burn-it-all-down essay for New York magazine that tied together the spectacular Charlie Sheen catastrophe, her own war-like TV experiences, sexism, and the mental illness fame causes. The piece has received more than 52,000 “likes” on Facebook to date, caused the Internet to explode in conversation, and reminded a wide swath of people that they had really missed Roseanne’s bilious brilliance.

“It really captured it, and was dead-on,” said Bernhard. “Hollywood’s a fucking mess. It’s just the way it is there. It’s hard to navigate those waters if you’re a sensitive, smart, big thinker like she is, like I am.”

Not that Barr had ever pulled a full-on J.D. Salinger and dropped out—she made talk show appearances, she blogs, she’s on Twitter and Facebook, she and Argent co-host a weekly radio show on a Southern California station, and she’s done plenty of stand-up. “I have that burning thing to get out there and be part of the dialogue and add something,” Barr said. “I feel like I’d be disappointing too many people if I ever zip it.”

But when Buck was smaller, he said to her, “‘I wonder what it would be like to have a real mom,’” Barr said. “So I showed him.”

Having Buck, after all, “saved my life,” Barr said. “If I didn’t have Buck, I probably wouldn’t be alive. Or I’d be so fucking mental I would have already moved over into schizophrenia.” Her professional life was actively destructive to her sanity. As one Roseanne writer, Joel Madison, recalled: “A million a week—if you’re at all unstable, I don’t think it helps you. There was a lot of who’s-she-listening-to-at-the-moment—all the people who were trying to angle to take over the show, whispering in her ear.”

Fathered by Ben Thomas, the chauffeur-bodyguard Barr married after her disastrous marriage to comedian (and Roseanne profiteer) Tom Arnold came to a scorching end, Buck was hard-won: Barr reversed tubal ligation surgery to restore her fertility, underwent IVF, and then was on bed rest for 12 weeks in order to keep the pregnancy. Plus, the most famous screamer of our time was prescribed peaceful thoughts. “They said, ‘You can’t have any stress,’” Barr recalled. “It’s, like, WHAT? The stress of not being able to be stressed—it was, like, ‘What, I’m supposed to be, calm?’ Luckily for me at the time there was the O.J. trial. I think that’s a huge American pastime. Now I’m putting it all on the Casey Anthony trial. Those are good things for us.”

So parenting Buck was paramount. What finally drove her to take time off, however, was her first reality television experience. In 2003, Barr signed up for a twofer. She would do a cooking and lifestyle show on ABC Family called Domestic Goddess (the feminist/pro-housewife phrase she had made iconic in her pre-Roseanne stand-up), but before that, an ABC reality series called The Real Roseanne would trace the making of the cooking show from inception to completion.

The Real Roseanne aired for two weeks in August 2003. By that time, Barr had already bailed on both projects, which she blames on the show’s executive producer, R.J. Cutler (The September Issue). “I wanted to discuss that now that I knew how to meditate and that I had become a calmer, nicer person, was I going to be able to make a successful show?” Barr said about The Real Roseanne’s premise. “That was the show I thought I was doing. And the show he was doing was kind of The Osbournes.”

Barr said that Cutler, who was supposed to be hiring staff for the cooking show, “hired actors to be the producers. And they were told to really go out of their way to piss me off and see me explode.” On top of that, her oldest son, Jake Pentland, found a notebook in the production office that contained unflattering, one-dimensional descriptions of her family members and then-new boyfriend Argent (Thomas and Barr divorced in 2002). “It said, Jake, ‘lazy,’ my son-in-law Jeff, ‘stupid,’ Roseanne ‘drunk,’ Johnny ‘golddigger,’” Barr said. “Thank God I had control. Because kibosh. When we saw the edited version, we were just appalled. We were just fucking appalled.”

(Cutler responded by email to the two allegations: “1. False—I don’t know anything about this notebook. 2. False—no actors were hired to pretend to be producers or to harm Ms. Barr in any way.”)

Instead of going forward, Barr opted to have a somewhat optional hysterectomy, and the public story was that she had to bow out for medical reasons. “I always say I had to choose between giving up an organ or continuing on that reality show. So I chose to give up an organ.”

After that calamity, the therapized—and Kabbalah-influenced (since she had become close to the much-followed, controversial Rav Philip Berg of the Kabbalah Centre)—Barr decided to escape. Her hide-in-plain-sight refuge was El Segundo, a middle-class California suburb of L.A. near LAX and the beach that’s named after Chevron’s second (or “segundo”) oil refinery. “I thought I could solve my isolation by just not being isolated,” Barr said. “I was like, ‘I don’t give a fuck. I’m going to move to a regular neighborhood. I’m going to drive a regular car. I’m going to shop. I’m going to go to Ralphs.’” And that’s what she did while Buck started going to the local public school.

At first, of course, it was a bit weird for the ordinary citizens of El Segundo to have Roseanne around. She established her work life in a small production studio on the city’s Main Street. She would set up a booth and sell her homemade hot sauce at the local farmers’ market, which shuts down the street on Thursday afternoons. “I thought they were looking at me as if they were watching TV. Like, it was human television,” Barr said. “They’d go, ‘Are you Roseanne?’”

“I’d say, ‘I used to be.’”

She, Buck, and Argent stayed in the El Segundo area until they moved to Hawaii, and that’s where she returns to when visiting Los Angeles. This interview occurred at a conference table in her studio—and since it was a Thursday, the farmers’ market began bustling outside as we talked (minus Roseanne’s hot sauce booth). Her sons Jake and Buck were both around; Jake, 33, runs the studio and Buck was going to meet a friend down the street for pizza. The only time she employed the high-registered bark of Roseanne Conner is when talking to Buck: “Do you have money? Where’s your shoes? Do you have shoes!”

Barr’s hair has gone gray and she has feather hair extensions—she looks like a hippie (check), grandma (check), stoner (check: every Friday night for Shabbat from sundown until 2 a.m., she gets high, drinks red wine, and does a meditation Rav Berg taught her). Her left-wing bent is now reflected in her physicality, which includes her choice to put herself on a farm in Hawaii. “I really think that growing your own food is ground zero—the biggest protest,” Barr said. “For kids to learn where food comes from, it is a huge revolutionary thought in America.” Plus, she added, “I just like it. I feel like a human being there.”

It’s a more balanced life. One in which her Cassandra-like predictions about the erasure of the middle class (“We’re going to go like Mexico—the rich people and the poor people.”); Michele Bachmann (“She makes Sarah Palin look sane. Doesn’t she?”); her sustained Twitter meltdown after the not guilty verdict in the Casey Anthony trial; and the disappearance of the sort of class mobility that allowed her to go from being a poor Jewish kid in Salt Lake City to a ridiculously rich-and-famous comedian (“It’s not going to happen for anyone ever again.”) can be tempered by happier thoughts. For instance, she appreciates the rise of female comedians on television, such as Chelsea Handler, Tina Fey, Amy Poehler, and the upcoming season’s star Whitney Cummings. “I just like that all these women are coming to TV and they’ll have their say,” Barr said. “I think that’ll be cool.”

Her years away from Hollywood’s intensity have given her—perhaps more than anything—the perspective to lower her own expectations. Right now, she’s applying that broadened view to Roseanne’s Nuts. “Nothing I ever do is going to compare to what I’ve done,” Barr said. “Before I always was like, ‘I’ve got to top it.’ Make myself fucking crazy and too nervous. You know what? You’re never going top it. For so long, too, I’d be, like, ‘I can’t play that part, it’s too Roseanne Conner. I don’t want to be Roseanne Conner.’ And now, I’m, like, ‘Fuck it! Wait a minute—she’s me.’



Thursday, July 07, 2011

News of the World to close as Rupert Murdoch acts to limit fallout

The tabloid's 200 staff are told that Sunday's edition will be the last, as speculation grows that it will be replaced by the Sun.

James Robinson guardian.co.uk

Rupert Murdoch acted with characteristic ruthlessness by closing the News of the World, Britain's best-selling Sunday newspaper, in a desperate attempt to limit the political and commercial fallout from the phone-hacking affair engulfing his media empire.

Murdoch's son James, who runs his UK titles, told the paper's 200 staff that Sunday's edition of the paper, which sells 2.6m copies a week, would be its last, ending the 168-year history of the title his father bought in 1969, a purchase that introduced him to the British public for the first time. The last News of the World will carry no commercial advertising.

"The good things the News of the World does … have been sullied by behaviour that was wrong. Indeed, if recent allegations are true, it was inhuman and has no place in our company," he said.

"The News of the World is in the business of holding others to account. But it failed when it came to itself."

There was immediate speculation last night that the paper will be replaced by a Sunday edition of the Sun which could be produced by staff at the daily. The domain names TheSunOnSunday.co.uk, TheSunOnSunday.com and SunOnSunday.co.uk were registered two days ago.

Readers and retailers had reacted with disgust to the revelation this week that journalists at the News of the World ordered the private investigator Glenn Mulcaire to hack into voicemail messages left on a mobile phone belonging to murdered teenager Milly Dowler in 2002, one of the most damaging in a series of reports by the Guardian on the hacking scandal over the last two years.

It also emerged that Mulcaire may have targeted the relatives of British servicemen killed in Afghanistan and Iraq and survivors of the 7/7 terrorist attacks on London. A reader boycott also seemed likely and one independent chain of newsagents said it would not stock the title.

Mark Lewis, the solicitor for Milly Dowler's family, said: "People are losing their jobs in order to sacrifice themselves to save the real perpetrators … lots of good individuals have lost their jobs or will lose their jobs and the people who should have fallen on their swords are still there."

Of Rupert Murdoch, who was filmed on a golf course during the crisis and refused to comment, Lewis added: "It's a bit like Nero fiddling while Rome was burning."

News International's chief executive, Rebekah Brooks, a former editor of the News of the World, was said to be in tears as news of the closure was announced. A News of the World employee who did not want to be named said Brooks had said she had offered to resign in the wake of Ed Miliband's call for her to be sacked, but that offer had been rejected. News International denies that claim.

Miliband said last night of the closure: "It's a big act but I don't think it solves the real issues. One of the people who's remaining in her job is the chief executive of News International who was the editor at the time of the hacking of Milly Dowler's phone."

Downing Street said last night: "What matters is that all wrongdoing is exposed and those responsible for these appalling acts are brought to justice."

Staff at the paper reacted with fury to the news, with one source claiming there was a "lynch mob mentality" at its London offices.

Colin Myler, the editor of the News of the World, said: "Whatever price this staff are paying for past misdeeds, nothing should diminish everything this great newspaper has achieved."

The newspaper was once Murdoch's flagship title although its stablemate, the Sun, is now more profitable, but it remained a totemic title around the world. In 1951 it sold 8.4m copies, the biggest ever circulation for any newspaper. Even now, only a handful of English-language newspapers can match its circulation.

The closure followed another day of high drama, during which more companies, including O2, the mobile phone company 3, Sainsbury's and Boots said they would not be placing adverts in the paper on Sunday. The News of the World takes about £660,000 in advertising income each weekend.

James Murdoch admitted to staff it was "a matter of serious regret" that he had authorised a six-figure payment to a phone-hacking victim several years ago, but blamed others at the company for his decision. "I now know that I did not have a complete picture when I did so," he said. "I acted on the advice of executives and lawyers."

A News of the World employee said staff suspected Murdoch had closed the title to ensure his £8bn bid to take full control of BSkyB goes through. Miliband has called for the deal to be blocked.

Labour MP Tom Watson, who has been highlighting the phone-hacking scandal at the paper for two years, said: "Rupert Murdoch did not close the News of the World. It is the revulsion of families up and down the land as to what they got up to. It was going to lose all its readers and it had no advertisers left. They had no choice."

Murdoch is renowned for risk-taking and for making bold moves swiftly. But the closure of the News of the World is one of the most shocking and unexpected decisions he has made since he moved his title secretly to Wapping in east London in a successful attempt to break the print unions. It is the first closure of a national newspaper in Britain since Today was shut down, also by Murdoch, in 1995.

Murdoch bought the News of the World 42 years ago after a protracted takeover battle with the late Robert Maxwell and immediately took it in a direction that many regarded as downmarket. It became the building block for his UK newspaper empire, which would in turn finance the expansion of News Corp into a global media conglomerate.

Saturday, July 02, 2011

What's Wrong With This Picture?

Josh Marshall TPM
July 1, 2011, 11:23AMThough President Obama once seemed to hold hopes of presiding over one of Washington's fabled 'grand bargains' to rein in the long-term national debt, recent events have painted a different picture. Republicans have pushed an increasingly maximalist line -- deep cuts to discretionary spending, Social Security and Medicare, zero new revenues and no effort to boost the economy at all. Meanwhile the president and his congressional allies have continued a series of tactical retreats with no clear stated limit on how much they'll concede.



But the picture is stranger when you leave the hot house environment of Washington, where I just spent a couple days and look at what evidence we actually have about the mood of the country.



The controversy in the debt ceiling debate has three main pillars. 1) raising taxes (or not) 2) cutting Social Security and Medicare (or not) and 3) the question of 'raising the debt ceiling' itself. For better or worse, discretionary spending is so detailed and various it's not highly politicized. But it may get there. So let's put it under the general heading of #2, budget cuts.



On the question of raising taxes on wealthier Americans, as a means of reining in the deficit, public opinion polls have been extremely consistent. Clear majorities and often in the range of 2 to 1 majorities support it.



Medicare and Social Security are probably the most obvious. Numerous polls over the last six months show that any cuts to Social Security or Medicare are extremely unpopular.



And that brings us to the popularity or unpopularity of raising the debt ceiling itself. In Washington and on Capitol Hill it's taken as a given that making a debt ceiling vote is political suicide. And it's true that it does not poll well. But even a cursory look at the polls show most people have very little understanding of what the question is and are much more divided than people -- or at least Washington -- realize. A Gallup poll from early May showed the second biggest number of people were those who said they didn't know enough about the question to have an opinion -- the Gallup poll from May 13: 47% said vote against a debt ceiling, 19% said vote for it and 34% said they didn't know enough to have an opinion. Note that 47% said don't vote to raise the debt ceiling at all. Not 'don't do it unless you get a good deal' but simply don't do it. Let the government default on its debts, which isn't even really up for discussion in Congress except for some on the Tea Party wing of the House GOP.



And more recent polls have shown rising support for raising the debt ceiling as the public learns more about potential consequences. The most recent poll from AP shows a tie: 41% oppose raising the debt limit, 38% support and 21% either say "neither" or "unsure".



That's hardly a public that's wildly against the proposition or even has terribly clear thoughts on the matter.



A fair reading of the debt limit polls is that when the public is asked should we take on more debt, it's not popular. Republicans are overwhelmingly against it. Some polls have said the rest of the electorate is divided. And a big chunk of the electorate doesn't even understand what the question is. It's really not at all clear that a vote to raise the debt limit is a clear political liability -- and the most recent poll shows the public evenly divided.



But again, draw back and see the big picture. The public overwhelmingly supports the Democrats on the tax question. On cutting Medicare and Social Security the public not only takes the Democrats side, the opposition to Republicans is at near lethal levels. The debt limit question may favor the Republicans but the public is generally divided and a significant plurality say they don't even understand the question.



From these facts, you'd expect that the debt ceiling/debt cutting debate would be a pitched battle or that the Democrats would have the whip hand. But that's far from the case. In fact, the Democrats have continued to concede ground as Republicans have upped the ante, daring the Democrats not to agree to cuts which are extremely unpopular.



Something doesn't fit about this picture. What's the disconnect? Some of this stems from deeper trends in the political economy -- a topic I'll discuss in another post. But the main answer is political. The Democrats have been overawed by Republicans continually raising the ante and bluffing -- and being genuinely worried about the consequences of the United States defaulting on its debt, something the GOP doesn't seem worried about. The real error here was buying into the idea of negotiations based on holding the future of the country's economy hostage. But now the problem is that the Democrats are focused on a behind closed doors negotiation with no outside game while not making any effort to bring the larger public into the conversation.

Rosewood