"A misguided Crusade?"
The single greatest threat to any presidency is an attitude of "Self Importance"
Without meaning to do so, President Bush is very likely defeating his ambitious Social Security Reform package. History presents two examples of such transaction.
1. In 1917 President Woodrow Wilson pleaded with the country to accept his 14 point peace plan and New World "League of Nations" plan. He spooked Democrats (And a number of Midwest Republicans) who were against the World War as it became clear US occupation in Europe as well as substantial costs to sustain US presence there would go on for years.
Wilson failed to realize how Americans saw him. He ignored warning he was seen as just another President in his second term, soon to leave.
He ignored historical evidence Presidents generally have two years in their first term to set an agenda and have a chance at success.
By 1917 his once much praised intellectual powers were increasingly marked by rigidity and a distinct intolerance. His caculating antics toward the suffragettes and Temperance movements angered friends and crirtics.
Historic public resentment of foreign adventure, and what smacked of a personal Wilson quest, matched by a bitterness over the loud quarrels by European allies that never seemed to end, eroded public support. He did not respond well to domestic issues or showed much interest in party politics.
In the 1916 Congressional Elections the GOP gained and the Democrats lost seats. His party never forgave him!
US involvement in the war itself in 1917/1918 made matters worse as casualties mounted and it looked the US was in a swamp. Post war violence in the Balkans and the Russian revolution added to the countries jitters. The "Red Scare" made the "League of Nations" idea seem dangerous.
Remarkably by 1919 Wilson had squandered much critical support by his "moralist" attitude and long trips to Europe to push his agenda, neglecting matters at home. His tragic falling out with Colonel House; his "Man in Europe" did much damage.
In 1919 the League of Nations treaty was defeated in the Senate by "Isolationist Democrats: ie: W. Jennings Bryan and Urban Republicans worried over the economy, and Wilson's ambition was swarted.
The Republicans returned to power in the 1920 elections by portraying Mr. Harding as "Normal and his term to be a return to nromalcy" and the Democrats, portrayed as crusaders, wasters of national treasure and young lives were exiled for 12 years.
Historically Wilson greatest failure was to groom a popular successor, his visible contempt for politicians would be duplicated by Jimmy Carter and today by GW Bush. Do you see GOP operatives trailing him and shouting their support?
2. In 1939 President Roosevelt sought to stack the US Supreme Court with younger less reactionary judges. He alienated everyone with what looked to be the worse kind of partisan legislation. Roosevelt betrayed his own ambition and burned away much public admiration.
Today much of America is suspicious of the Bush camp and there is a whiff of realization that Mr. Bush has a habit of putting a ideological spin on his ambitions. He acts as if he's saving America or that his plans are critical to the nations future.
The public gets fatigued when politicians talk in such language.
The President does not believe or understand that he was re-elected less by his virtues than by John Kerry's vices and flaws.
The Democrats will play the "Rich Republicans trying to cheat the working folk" card in 2006, and a tired electorate might listen, if for any reason, to shut the president up!
George Bush ignores a well documented public cynicism about Iraq and does not realize the political damage of steady drum beat of car bombings and mass killings in Baghdad erode support for him.
Plus there is the legacy of the Internet Boom and bust that still galls investors.
The President really believes most folks want the added task of private accounts on top already busy lives!
His 60 stops in 60 days resembles Woodrow Wilson's national campaign to sell the League of Nations. Like President Wilson, Mr. Bush comes across as anxious, ignoring orther important duties, and lost in a fog of personal ambition and ideology few support or are interested in.
Just as dangerous, Mr. Bush fails to glimmer (or is indifferent about) public perceptions of him as a scion of wealth or as a ambitious evangelical.
Watching TV, listening to radio, and following blogs, it becomes obvious (to me) this Social Security plan seems to be a huge ambition for a not so big problem.
Perhaps the Bush Administration should ease up on such intensity, drop the private accounts plan for a few years and offer a smaller, less dramatic plan, and then concentrate of ending the war and reducing the deficit
For further Reference see PBS "American experience: The Wilson Crusade"